[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <ACD4236E-A309-465F-8789-DA3A5B648313@mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:55:21 -0500
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU>
To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Roger Leigh <rleigh@...elibre.net>,
Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, util-linux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: /etc/fstab.d yes or not
I am extremely dubious about systemd, and would much rather it not be on any system that *I* run (and using UUID's to identify kernel notification is just whacko) , but I have to agree with Kay in that /etc/fstab.d is Just Wrong. The /etc/fstab file is parsed by many programs, shell scripts, and not just the ones in util-linux. We should consider it an ABI, and not mess with it.
-- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists