linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] W1: OMAP HDQ1W: use 32-bit register accesses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 23 Jan 2012 23:36:38 +0300
From:	Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
To:	Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>
Cc:	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, neilb@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] W1: OMAP HDQ1W: use 32-bit register accesses

On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:57:09AM -0700, Paul Walmsley (paul@...an.com) wrote:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg156572.html

Well, if runtime PM does its job for clock manipulation properly, then
things should be fine. I suppose that ->probe() will fire up first and
you say it boots and detects w1 properly, so patch looks good.
Feel free to add my ack

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/