[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120123211834.GA3981@sepie.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:18:34 +0100
From: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: disable -Wmissing-field-initializers for W=1
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 05:54:10AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> -Wmissing-field-initializers is too noisy to be useful on W=1. Let's
> move it to W=2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> scripts/Makefile.build | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.build b/scripts/Makefile.build
> index d2b366c..1535a2f 100644
> --- a/scripts/Makefile.build
> +++ b/scripts/Makefile.build
> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ endif
> ifdef KBUILD_ENABLE_EXTRA_GCC_CHECKS
> warning- := $(empty)
>
> -warning-1 := -Wextra -Wunused -Wno-unused-parameter
> +warning-1 := -Wextra -Wunused -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-missing-field-initializers
I would use $(call cc-disable-warning, missing-field-initializers), so
that W=1 has a chance of working with gcc 3.x.
Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists