[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120123234028.628058547@clark.kroah.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:39:53 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>,
Bruno Friedmann <bruno@...a-net.ch>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: [67/90] intel idle: Make idle driver more robust
3.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
commit 5c2a9f06a9cd7194f884cdc88144866235dec07d upstream.
kvm -cpu host passes the original cpuid info to the guest.
Latest kvm version seem to return true for mwait_leaf cpuid
function on recent Intel CPUs. But it does not return mwait
C-states (mwait_substates), instead zero is returned.
While real CPUs seem to always return non-zero values, the intel
idle driver should not get active in kvm (mwait_substates == 0)
case and bail out.
Otherwise a Null pointer exception will happen later when the
cpuidle subsystem tries to get active:
[0.984807] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
[0.984807] IP: [<(null)>] (null)
...
[0.984807][<ffffffff8143cf34>] ? cpuidle_idle_call+0xb4/0x340
[0.984807][<ffffffff8159e7bc>] ? __atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x4c/0x70
[0.984807][<ffffffff81001198>] ? cpu_idle+0x78/0xd0
Reference:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726296
Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
CC: Bruno Friedmann <bruno@...a-net.ch>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
drivers/idle/intel_idle.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
+++ b/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
@@ -321,7 +321,8 @@ static int intel_idle_probe(void)
cpuid(CPUID_MWAIT_LEAF, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &mwait_substates);
if (!(ecx & CPUID5_ECX_EXTENSIONS_SUPPORTED) ||
- !(ecx & CPUID5_ECX_INTERRUPT_BREAK))
+ !(ecx & CPUID5_ECX_INTERRUPT_BREAK) ||
+ !mwait_substates)
return -ENODEV;
pr_debug(PREFIX "MWAIT substates: 0x%x\n", mwait_substates);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists