[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxggjW6FKhf7KSCRMD-4YF9ymsxDQ+EMtUTThX16r-8tw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:49:39 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Edward Shishkin <edward@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Stop clearing uptodate flag on write IO error
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote:
>
> So how does XFS decide whether a write should fail and shutdown the
> file system, or just "try forever"?
Why would it bother? XFS tends to be a filesystem that you'd only use
for core files in environments where you have a system manager that
knows what he is doing. So there, maybe "try forever" is the right
thing to do.
Things are a bit different with some random unreliable USB stick FAT32
filesystem that just died on you, with a normal user that just removes
the thing or doesn't even notice that the stick is now dead. There the
"try forever" is totally the wrong thing to do.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists