[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1327309415.1955.87.camel@aeonflux>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:03:35 +0100
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To: Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Regression: Revert "Bluetooth: use buffer priority to
mark URB_ISO_ASAP flag"
Hi Keith,
> URB_ISO_ASAP may only be used with iso end points, but this patch was
> attempting to use it with a bulk endpoint. When DEBUG is defined in
> the USB stack, it checks for invalid flags and returns -EINVAL instead
> of actually transmitting the data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>
> ---
a version of this patch should be already upstream or in stable trees.
If you are sending this again, then it might slipped through. Johan?
> Ok, so this is a comedy of errors. The Bluetooth code is trying to use
> an iso-specific flag (URB_ISO_ASAP) on a bulk endpoint, which is
> invalid, but normally harmless. Unless the USB code is compiled for
> debugging, in which case it checks a bunch for incorrect usage and
> discards URBs which are wrong.
>
> As far as I'm concerned, #ifdef DEBUG code should never ever change
> the behaviour of the code, and so I'd say the USB code is even more
> broken than the bluetooth code...
And yes, this one is hilarious.
Regards
Marcel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists