linux-kernel - Re: [patch 2/4] [RFC] syscalls, x86: Add __NR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120124162031.a3956058.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:20:31 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
	Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] [RFC] syscalls, x86: Add __NR_kcmp syscall v4

On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:17:16 +0400
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:04:19PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > On 01/23/2012 10:47 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Why under /arch ?
> > >>
> > > 
> > > Hi Kame,
> > > 
> > > because I've tested it under x86 only. Once someone
> > > confirm it's needed on some else arch and does work
> > > as expected -- it wont be a problem to make it system
> > > wide. Until then -- I think better to stick with
> > > at least tested case.
> > > ...
> > 
> > That's not a reason to put it in arch/ ... that's possibly a reason to
> > not map the system call on other architectures yet.
> > 
> 
> Where it should live then? In kernel/ or mm/ ?
> 

kernel/checkpoint_restart ?

gathering related changes to a directory may help developpers joins later....
To me, this makes seeing git log easy ;)
 
Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/