lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:52:03 -0800 From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>, Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Andrew Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> Subject: Re: [patch 1/4] fs, proc: Introduce /proc/<pid>/task/<tid>/children entry v8 Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> writes: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 04:07:09PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: >> > >> > Hmm. But userspace app will get eof, so frankly I don't see >> > a problem here. Or maybe I miss something? >> > >> >> Userspace need to take care of whether there may be"\n" or not even >> if read() returns EOF. >> As an interface, it's BUG to say "\n" will be there if you're lucky!" >> (*) I know script language can handle this but we shouldn't assume that. >> >> How about just remove "\n" at EOF ? I think it's unnecessary. >> > > Sure thing, it's not a problem to remove it completely. Foolish question. Is there any reason why this is a file instead of being the obvious directory full of symlinks? Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists