[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1327399885.2614.5.camel@laptop>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:11:25 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Yasunori Goto <y-goto@...fujitsu.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Motohiro Kosaki <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Linux Kernel ML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] TASK_DEAD task is able to be woken up in special
condition
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 10:42 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Well, but does the -rt kernel suffer from the same race?
Yes it does
> It can
> generate delays at the exact same place, and can generate much
> longer delays than an SMI, if a high-prio RT task comes along.
>
No it can't, since do_exit() plays silly games with preempt_disable().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists