[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120124154001.GB10990@amt.cnet>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:40:01 -0200
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, leonid.moiseichuk@...ia.com,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, mel@....ul.ie, rientjes@...gle.com,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ronen Hod <rhod@...hat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] /dev/low_mem_notify
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 08:51:13PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Ok, so here's a proof of concept patch that implements sample-base
> per-process free threshold VM event watching using perf-like syscall
> ABI. I'd really like to see something like this that's much more
> extensible and clean than the /dev based ABIs that people have
> proposed so far.
>
> Pekka
What is the practical advantage of a syscall, again?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists