[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1327422364.2446.75.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:26:04 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: acme@...hat.com, mingo@...e.hu, paulus@...ba.org,
cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: [RFCv3 0/9] perf tool: parser generator for events parsing
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 13:31 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> Here's new version of event parsing patchset. To summarize:
> - adding event parser bison/flex generator
> - the event syntax stays as it was
> - adding event format file sysfs attribute
> for pmu device
Added Greg to CC, please also see: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/1/16/148
Right, lets hope we can convince the sysfs people that a few lines are
ok.. if not we need to find another way to represent all this muck, one
alternative is exploding the whole thing into a sysfs hierarchy like:
format/event: config:0-7
...
format/config: config:0-63
format/config1: config1:0-63
format/config2: config2:0-63
that will of course consume loads more resources but if that's what it
takes :-(
> - adding new syntax to specify raw events based
> on the sysfs pmu's format attribute
> eg. "cpu/config=1,config1=2,config2=3/u"
fair enough, so we have the attributes from the $FORMAT thingy and (for
now) one hardcoded 'period' thing.
Should we worry about namespace collisions for the built-in vs format
provided names?
I suppose that once we get all this in (and it looks good from my pov),
we can start thinking about doing things like:
events/cycles: event=0x3c
Which together with:
format/event: config:0-7
would allow us to write something like:
cpu/event=cycles/u
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists