linux-kernel - Re: [41/42] xfs: validate acl count

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120124174330.GQ8262@sgi.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:43:30 -0600
From:	Ben Myers <bpm@....com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [41/42] xfs: validate acl count

Christoph,

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 05:33:01PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:52:06AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > I ran xfstests with 'xfs: validate acl count' and 'xfs: fix acl count
> > > > > validation in xfs_acl_from_disk()' applied to 3.1-stable.  It came out
> > > > > ok.  I'll get started on 2.6.32.
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks, how about the 3.0 release?
> > > 
> > > HCH would have given them a spin before he sent them to stable@.
> > 
> > You are right, sorry, for some reason I thought that was for 3.1, too
> > many different kernel trees at the moment :(
> 
> This should go into 3.0 and 3.1 stable, too.

This made 3.0, but unfortunately not 3.1, which is end-of-life.

-Ben

> And I think this one actually is simple enough that I don't need a QA
> run, so if you can just add it, please do.
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/