linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] xfs: change available ranges in quota check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120124174612.GC9853@infradead.org>
Date:	Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:46:12 -0500
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Mitsuo Hayasaka <mitsuo.hayasaka.hu@...achi.com>
Cc:	Ben Myers <bpm@....com>, Alex Elder <aelder@....com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, xfs-masters@....sgi.com,
	yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] xfs: change available ranges in quota check

On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:45:14PM +0900, Mitsuo Hayasaka wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This patch series changes available ranges of softlimit and
> hardlimit in quota check, as follows.
> 
> (1) Consider new reservation for quota check
>     The disk block reservation checks if (current usage + new
>     reservation) reach the quota limit although the inode reservation
>     does not use the new reservation for quota check. It should
>     consider it, as well. This is mandatory for (2).

Can you send a testcase that reproduces issues with the old behaviour?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/