linux-kernel - Re: LPC32xx status (Re: [PATCH] Correct bad gpio naming)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120124210924.GD8502@pengutronix.de>
Date:	Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:09:24 +0100
From:	Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
To:	Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
Cc:	linux@....linux.org.uk, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	grant.likely@...retlab.ca, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kevin Wells <kevin.wells@....com>
Subject: Re: LPC32xx status (Re: [PATCH] Correct bad gpio naming)


> Unfortunately, I currently don't have a phy3250, but can check
> tomorrow with colleagues.

Shouldn't matter that much, or? Once the core support is back and works for
your board, others could test with their boards.

> I guess the work92105_defconfig is only useful once the drivers
> currently missing in mainline are merged. Or is there an arm specific
> tree I should update from?

You can keep the work92105_defconfig in your tree, but we'd need to introduce a
lpc32xx_defconfig. That should start with a minimal (but working) config and
can be extended once the drivers are in place.

Regards,

   Wolfram

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)