linux-kernel - [PATCH 4/9] perf bench: Also allow measuring alternative memcpy implementations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1327446481-5505-5-git-send-email-acme@infradead.org>
Date:	Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:07:56 -0200
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/9] perf bench: Also allow measuring alternative memcpy implementations

From: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>

Intended to be able to support the current selection of the preferred
memcpy() implementation, this patch adds the ability to also measure the
two alternative implementations, again by way of using some
pre-processsor replacement.

While on my Westmere system this proves that the movsb based variant is
worse than the movsq based one (since the ERMS feature isn't there), it
also shows that here for the default as well as small sizes the unrolled
variant outperforms the movsq one.

Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4F16D728020000780006D732@nat28.tlf.novell.com
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
 tools/perf/bench/mem-memcpy-x86-64-asm-def.h |    8 ++++++++
 tools/perf/bench/mem-memcpy-x86-64-asm.S     |    4 ++++
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/mem-memcpy-x86-64-asm-def.h b/tools/perf/bench/mem-memcpy-x86-64-asm-def.h
index d588b87..d66ab79 100644
--- a/tools/perf/bench/mem-memcpy-x86-64-asm-def.h
+++ b/tools/perf/bench/mem-memcpy-x86-64-asm-def.h
@@ -2,3 +2,11 @@
 MEMCPY_FN(__memcpy,
 	"x86-64-unrolled",
 	"unrolled memcpy() in arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S")
+
+MEMCPY_FN(memcpy_c,
+	"x86-64-movsq",
+	"movsq-based memcpy() in arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S")
+
+MEMCPY_FN(memcpy_c_e,
+	"x86-64-movsb",
+	"movsb-based memcpy() in arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S")
diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/mem-memcpy-x86-64-asm.S b/tools/perf/bench/mem-memcpy-x86-64-asm.S
index 384b607..a20780b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/bench/mem-memcpy-x86-64-asm.S
+++ b/tools/perf/bench/mem-memcpy-x86-64-asm.S
@@ -1,2 +1,6 @@
 #define memcpy MEMCPY /* don't hide glibc's memcpy() */
+#define altinstr_replacement text
+#define globl p2align 4; .globl
+#define Lmemcpy_c globl memcpy_c; memcpy_c
+#define Lmemcpy_c_e globl memcpy_c_e; memcpy_c_e
 #include "../../../arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S"
-- 
1.7.9.rc2.1.g69204

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/