[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201201250018.16848.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:18:16 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 24
Hi Stephen,
On Tuesday, January 24, 2012, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20120123:
>
> New tree: ktest
> Reinstated tree: input-mt
>
> My fixes tree contains:
> powerpc: make PSERIES_IDLE bool
>
> Linus' tree gained a build failure for which I applied a patch.
>
> The arm tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
>
> The arm-soc tree lost its conflicts but gained another against the arm
> tree.
>
> The s5p tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree.
>
> The nfs tree lost its build failure.
>
> The sound-asoc tree lost its build failure.
>
> The input tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
> next-20120123.
>
> The akpm tree lost several patches that were merged into Linus' tree.
Is there any new material touching kernel/workqueue.c or kernel/freezer.c?
We seem to have a freezer regression in linux-next which doesn't seem to be
present in my tree.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists