[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <4F1FD630.8070606@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:15:12 +0100
From: Karol Lewandowski <k.lewandowsk@...sung.com>
To: Karol Lewandowski <k.lewandowsk@...sung.com>
Cc: broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
m.szyprowski@...sung.com, s.nawrocki@...sung.com, lrg@...com,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: Set apply_uV only when min and max voltages are
defined
On 25.01.2012 10:31, Karol Lewandowski wrote:
> apply_uV is errornously set when regulator is instantiated from device
> tree, even when it doesn't contain any voltage constraints.
...
> - if (constraints->min_uV == constraints->max_uV)
> + if (min_uV&& max_uV&& constraints->min_uV == constraints->max_uV)
> constraints->apply_uV = true;
While this fixes obvious error I doubt that apply_uV should be set based
on min max equality. It have required fix to fixed regulator[1]
as well for max8997[2]. It'll probably require fixes in other places too.
Wouldn't it be better to explicitly use property like
"regulator-voltage-apply" in DT to set apply_uV?
if (min_uV && max_uV && constraints->min_uV == constraints->max_uV
&& of_find_property "regulator-voltage-apply")
constraints->apply_uV = true;
This would be consistent with handling of this flag from platform data.
[1] http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1234969
[2] http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1243714
Regards,
--
Karol Lewandowski | Samsung Poland R&D Center | Linux/Platform
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists