lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1327494921.17654.10.camel@cr0>
Date:	Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:35:21 +0800
From:	Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kmap_atomic tree with the
 ecryptfs tree

On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 13:32 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Cong,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the kmap_atomic tree got a conflict in
> fs/ecryptfs/read_write.c between commit f28b7904d455 ("eCryptfs: Remove
> unused ecryptfs_read()") from the ecryptfs tree and commit 27de090e3326
> ("ecryptfs: remove the second argument of k[un]map_atomic()") from the
> kmap_atomic tree.
> 
> The former just removed the entire ecryptfs_read() function that was
> modified as part of the latter, so I did that.
> 

Hi, Stephen,

Sounds good to me! Thank you!


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ