linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] regulator: tps65910: Sleep control through external inputs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:50:20 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Cc:	"lrg@...com" <lrg@...com>,
	"jedu@...mlogic.co.uk" <jedu@...mlogic.co.uk>,
	"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	"gg@...mlogic.co.uk" <gg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] regulator: tps65910: Sleep control through external
 inputs

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 06:17:43PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 January 2012 06:12 PM, Mark Brown wrote:

> >This really isn't what the set_mode() API is for - especially the fact
> >that it supports turning the regulator off which really isn't what
> >set_mode() is supposed to do.  A generic driver using this API isn't
> >going to play too well.

> Then what should be the method? Is it through the macro similar to
> patch V1 where LOW_POWER mode option come from platform data? The
> idea  is to set the regulator in OFF or low power mode based on
> external control.

Like I said we've got the various suspend callbacks for setting the
behaviour in suspend mode.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)