linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] regulator: add device tree support for max8997

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120125133254.GJ3687@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:32:54 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Karol Lewandowski <k.lewandowsk@...sung.com>
Cc:	Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@...aro.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rpurdie@...ys.net,
	rob.herring@...xeda.com, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
	kgene.kim@...sung.com, myungjoo.ham@...sung.com,
	kyungmin.park@...sung.com, dg77.kim@...sung.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] regulator: add device tree support for max8997

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 01:02:29PM +0100, Karol Lewandowski wrote:
> On 25.01.2012 12:26, Mark Brown wrote:

> However, I still find it little problematic that dt and non-dt
> versions behave differently when given the same set of parameters
> (previously apply_uV wasn't the default and required explicit flag).

Well, they're different things.  Device tree isn't Linux specific at
all.

> Thomas, would you mind adding small note to pmic's bindings
> documentation stating that Buck6 is basically on/off switch? (Thus,
> no voltage should nor can be specified).

At some point you end up copying the entire datasheet in there...

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)