[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1327504213.2614.78.camel@laptop>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:10:13 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Indan Zupancic <indan@....nu>,
Youquan Song <youquan.song@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] sched: unified sched_powersavings sysfs
tunable
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 21:52 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
> @@ -6150,10 +6150,8 @@ SD_INIT_FUNC(CPU)
> SD_INIT_FUNC(ALLNODES)
> SD_INIT_FUNC(NODE)
> #endif
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_POWERSAVE
> SD_INIT_FUNC(SIBLING)
> -#endif
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_MC
> SD_INIT_FUNC(MC)
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_BOOK
> @@ -6250,7 +6248,7 @@ static void claim_allocations(int cpu, struct sched_domain *sd)
> *per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sgp, cpu) = NULL;
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_POWERSAVE
> static const struct cpumask *cpu_smt_mask(int cpu)
> {
> return topology_thread_cpumask(cpu);
> @@ -6261,10 +6259,8 @@ static const struct cpumask *cpu_smt_mask(int cpu)
> * Topology list, bottom-up.
> */
> static struct sched_domain_topology_level default_topology[] = {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_POWERSAVE
> { sd_init_SIBLING, cpu_smt_mask, },
> -#endif
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_MC
> { sd_init_MC, cpu_coregroup_mask, },
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_BOOK
I don't like this either, SCHED_{MC,SMT} here have nothing to do with
powersavings, its topology support.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists