[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1327505788.2614.81.camel@laptop>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:36:28 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Indan Zupancic <indan@....nu>,
Youquan Song <youquan.song@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] sched: unified sched_powersavings sysfs
tunable
On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 07:12 -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 1/25/2012 7:10 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
>
> btw... any reason why this feature is a config option with tons of
> ifdefs... why not just have this available all the time?
> it shouldn't be all that much code in the first place.
I guess its because SCHED_SMT and SCHED_MC also indicate the
availability of the topology functions like cpu_coregroup_mask() etc.
The whole powersave stuff got intermixed with all that.
But yes, I agree, we should kill all that and sort the topology stuff
differently.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists