[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1327522599.2605.14.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:16:39 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: "Pradeep A. Dalvi" <netdev@...deepdalvi.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] amd/lance.c: dev_alloc_skb to netdev_alloc_skb
Le jeudi 26 janvier 2012 à 01:31 +0530, Pradeep A. Dalvi a écrit :
> Thanks Eric! Even if we try to skip NET_SKB_PAD i.e. max of 32 or
> L1_CACHE_BYTES, SKB_DATA_ALIGN is anyway going to add some additional
> bytes for the same reason.
>
> And towards the end, as from my current understanding regarding skb
> allocations, for MTU including alignments < 2048, there is not much to
> worry about. As long as, it doesn't cross the boundary.
>
> (And in fact, this driver doesn't even get compiled with current
> configs, even after forcefully adding CONFIG_ISA & CONFIG_LANCE, of
> course along with CONFIG_ISA_DMA_API. Had to change the Makefile)
Point is we dont need skbs at all, and we dont need NET_SKB_PAD padding
either.
Also a big blob of DMA memory (rx_buffs) is allocated but never used.
Best is to not touch this, since this driver is probably not anymore
used.
Dont bother.
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/lance.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/lance.c
index a6e2e84..aa2c6cd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/lance.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/amd/lance.c
@@ -240,9 +240,8 @@ struct lance_private {
const char *name;
/* The saved address of a sent-in-place packet/buffer, for skfree(). */
struct sk_buff* tx_skbuff[TX_RING_SIZE];
- /* The addresses of receive-in-place skbuffs. */
- struct sk_buff* rx_skbuff[RX_RING_SIZE];
- unsigned long rx_buffs; /* Address of Rx and Tx buffers. */
+ /* The addresses of receive-in-place buffers. */
+ void *rx_buff[RX_RING_SIZE];
/* Tx low-memory "bounce buffer" address. */
char (*tx_bounce_buffs)[PKT_BUF_SZ];
int cur_rx, cur_tx; /* The next free ring entry */
@@ -364,7 +363,6 @@ static void cleanup_card(struct net_device *dev)
free_dma(dev->dma);
release_region(dev->base_addr, LANCE_TOTAL_SIZE);
kfree(lp->tx_bounce_buffs);
- kfree((void*)lp->rx_buffs);
kfree(lp);
}
@@ -552,10 +550,6 @@ static int __init lance_probe1(struct net_device *dev, int ioaddr, int irq, int
if (lance_debug > 6) printk(" (#0x%05lx)", (unsigned long)lp);
dev->ml_priv = lp;
lp->name = chipname;
- lp->rx_buffs = (unsigned long)kmalloc(PKT_BUF_SZ*RX_RING_SIZE,
- GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!lp->rx_buffs)
- goto out_lp;
if (lance_need_isa_bounce_buffers) {
lp->tx_bounce_buffs = kmalloc(PKT_BUF_SZ*TX_RING_SIZE,
GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -739,8 +733,6 @@ out_dma:
out_tx:
kfree(lp->tx_bounce_buffs);
out_rx:
- kfree((void*)lp->rx_buffs);
-out_lp:
kfree(lp);
return err;
}
@@ -842,11 +834,9 @@ lance_purge_ring(struct net_device *dev)
/* Free all the skbuffs in the Rx and Tx queues. */
for (i = 0; i < RX_RING_SIZE; i++) {
- struct sk_buff *skb = lp->rx_skbuff[i];
- lp->rx_skbuff[i] = NULL;
+ kfree(lp->rx_buff[i]);
+ lp->rx_buff[i] = NULL;
lp->rx_ring[i].base = 0; /* Not owned by LANCE chip. */
- if (skb)
- dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
}
for (i = 0; i < TX_RING_SIZE; i++) {
if (lp->tx_skbuff[i]) {
@@ -868,16 +858,9 @@ lance_init_ring(struct net_device *dev, gfp_t gfp)
lp->dirty_rx = lp->dirty_tx = 0;
for (i = 0; i < RX_RING_SIZE; i++) {
- struct sk_buff *skb;
- void *rx_buff;
-
- skb = alloc_skb(PKT_BUF_SZ, GFP_DMA | gfp);
- lp->rx_skbuff[i] = skb;
- if (skb) {
- skb->dev = dev;
- rx_buff = skb->data;
- } else
- rx_buff = kmalloc(PKT_BUF_SZ, GFP_DMA | gfp);
+ void *rx_buff = kmalloc(PKT_BUF_SZ, GFP_DMA | gfp);
+
+ lp->rx_buff[i] = rx_buff;
if (rx_buff == NULL)
lp->rx_ring[i].base = 0;
else
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists