[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120124172732.19b3d9f4.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:27:32 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Paul Tuner <pjt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] proc: speedup /proc/stat handling
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:22:25 +0100
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> Le mardi 24 janvier 2012 __ 16:12 -0800, Andrew Morton a __crit :
>
> > Did you measure the improvement from this patch?
>
> Unfortunately I can not reboot the server where I noticed this
> performance problem.
>
> On the smaller one, performance improvement is about 20%, because the
> second run of show_stat() can use data present in cpu cache.
>
> On big machines, I guess the 128 bytes per possible cpu reservation can
> avoid the second run. (since a typical cpuXXX line is smaller than 128
> bytes)
I had a fiddle on an 8-way x86_64 machine. I'm unable to demonstrate
any improvement for either of
time (for i in $(seq 1000); do; cat /proc/self/stat > /dev/null; done)
time (for i in $(seq 1000); do; cat /proc/1/stat > /dev/null; done)
oh well.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists