| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1201252303060.4417@swampdragon.chaosbits.net> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:04:04 +0100 (CET) From: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net> To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [000/129] 3.2.2-stable review On Wed, 25 Jan 2012, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:47:08PM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Jan 2012, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > #include <stable/formletter.h> > > > #define RELEASE 3.2.2-rc1 > > > #define NUM_PATCHES 129 > > > #define RESPONSE_DATE "Wed, Jan 25, 2012 20:00:00 +0000" > > > #define LOCATION kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.2.2-rc1.gz > > > > A very small, seriously not at all important, tiny question; Why are the > > patches for 3.2.x placed in /pub/linux/kernel/v3.**0**/ ??? > > It's a symlink, why not? :) > Just seems confusing, that's all.. After all, 3.2.x is not 3.0.x, so it looks like an error... Not at all important, that's just the impression I got.. -- Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net> http://www.chaosbits.net/ Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists