[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+8MBb+gCrcs5=LdE0j-kh=xcVDLhRYWqeQSTRE7qfH-OsDVzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:07:17 -0800
From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Myron Stowe <mstowe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use acpi_os_map_memory() instead of ioremap() in einj driver
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> I can understand why here C memory access model can work because ACPI table
> is in physical memory zone but not in device space, but I still have
> two confusion: 1)why ioremap fail but acpi_os_map_memory can work? In
> essential
> acpi_os_map_memory is ioremap (or precisely, ioremap_cache), right?
Myron has been asking the same questions. Probably the difference is
between cache and nocache. But it unclear what changed between 3.2-rc7
(where these ioremap() calls worked) and 3.3-rc1 (where they fail).
> 2)since acpi_os_map_memory is io mapping too (though it is a little bit
> special), read/write should work besides *C memory access*. If so, why
> removing
> read/write here? Some ARCH compatibility or compilation issue?
It's just prettier - avoids the need for the local copies of readq()/writeq()
for 32-bit systems too.
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists