[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120126093936.GA13963@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:39:36 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Yasunori Goto <y-goto@...fujitsu.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Motohiro Kosaki <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Linux Kernel ML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] TASK_DEAD task is able to be woken up in special condition
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > It can generate delays at the exact same place, and can
> > generate much longer delays than an SMI, if a high-prio RT
> > task comes along.
>
> No it can't, since do_exit() plays silly games with
> preempt_disable().
ok, it being a critical section on both -rt and vanilla upstream
explains it.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists