lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120126135504.GA13107@elte.hu>
Date:	Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:55:04 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] tracing/module: Move tracepoint out of module.h


* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 11:28 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > How much more do we save if we move all of try_module_get() out 
> > of line? It still seems a rather thick inline function with 
> > preempt section and all. I'd *really* suggest that it should all 
> > be uninlined.
> > 
> 
> Here's the #'s
> 
>    text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
> 7489488	2249584	9719808	19458880	128eb40	vmlinux-prepatch
>    text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
> 7482458	2248048	9719808	19450314	128c9ca	vmlinux-postpatch
>    text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
> 7477393	2248080	9719808	19445281	128b621	vmlinux-updatedpatch
> 
> Thus we get an additional 5k it seems, for a total of 13k savings.
> 
> The below patch is what I used. Note, since the tracepoint 
> requires the instruction pointer, I created stub versions that 
> call a "do_" version of the function to pass in the local 
> instruction counter.

Hm, why does this tracepoint include a flat RIP? It's pretty 
superfluous as there's various other (orghogonal) ways to get at 
the RIP.

If the field is needed for compatibility then lets set it to 
zero at the tracepoint level and not burden the module.h 
hotpath.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ