linux-kernel - Re: How to "register" a GSI for a non PCI non ISA device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120126160719.3b9be3b3@xilun>
Date:	Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:07:19 +0100
From:	Guillaume Knispel <gknispel@...formatique.com>
To:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc:	Guillaume Knispel <gknispel@...formatique.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	Xavier Carcelle <xcarcelle@...ncall.com>,
	Noé Rubinstein <nrubinstein@...ncall.com>
Subject: Re: How to "register" a GSI for a non PCI non ISA device

On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:02:14 -0500
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 06:23:14PM +0100, Guillaume Knispel wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:56:53 -0500
> > Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > What is the benefit of implementing ACPI on this custom system?
> > 
> > For our short term project it seems to be more a necessity than a
> > benefit. ACPI is supported by the SoC, tables are already largely
> > provided by Coreboot, the whole x86 ecosystem including Linux is more
> > or less based around ACPI, and my whole interrogation comes from the
> > fact that *acpi*_register_gsi() seems to be necessary to configure a
> > GSI in the APIC but is not exported anymore, so my guess is that if I
> 
> Hm, isn't it __acpi_register_gsi?

__acpi_register_gsi exists on recent kernels, it is the pointer to
the underlying implementation of that function depending on the
platform (x86 / xen-x86) and on the variant of the platform (pic/apic).
acpi_register_gsi still exists and it calls __acpi_register_gsi.

> > can't call it explicitly from my LKM, there should better be a way to
> > make it be called when an ACPI thing is done, or maybe a legacy table
> > parsed.
> 
> Can you do it the way xen does? Look in arch/x86/xen/pci.c

Did not found this file. Besides, isn't Xen a separate architecture
from mainline x86, compiled built-in? My goal is to only touch LKM and
system firmware if necessary.

> > As we first target an unmodified (if possible) 2.6.32 kernel from
> > Debian Squeeze, I can't just re-export acpi_register_gsi() and call it
> > a day. (If I've no other choice I'll obviously do it, but this would be
> > quite bad for future maintenance).
> 
> Oh wow. That is ancient. 3.2?

3.2 when a Debian stable will feature 3.2 :)

-- 
Guillaume Knispel
Avencall - 10 bis, rue Lucien Voilin - 92800 Puteaux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/