linux-kernel - Re: [3.2+] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0/0x10000100

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1327594823.2062.0.camel@scapa>
Date:	Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:20:23 +0100
From:	Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@...ian.org>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [3.2+] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0/0x10000100

On jeu., 2012-01-26 at 08:15 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> Very odd, it wouldn't seem that this patch would cause such a problem,
> as it is "obviously" correct.
> 
> Kuninori, any thoughts about this?  Should I revert this from the
> tree? 

Something puzzles me. Just after posting I noticed that 3.2.2 was
released, so i tried it (vanilla), and I didn't get the BUG().

Will git bisect work in a forward way (3.2.1 is bad, 3.2.2 is good).

Regards,
-- 
Yves-Alexis

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)