[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1327595209.2446.117.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:26:49 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: acme@...hat.com, mingo@...e.hu, paulus@...ba.org,
cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] perf: Add sysfs format attribute for pmu device
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 13:31 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> Adding 'format' attribute for pmu device that contains
> a syntax description on how to construct raw events.
>
> The event configuration is described in following
> struct pefr_event_attr attributes:
>
> config
> config1
> config2
>
> Each line of the format file describes mapping of name
> and bitfield definition within one of abve attributes.
>
> eg:
> event config:0-7
> umask config:8-15
> usr config:16
> os config:17
> edge config:18
> any config:21
> inv config:23
> cmask config:24-31
>
> Line syntax:
> line: NAME config ':' bits
> config: 'config' | 'config1' | 'config2"
> bits: bits ',' bit_term | bit_term
> bit_term: VALUE '-' VALUE | VALUE
>
> Adding event_format callback to the struct pmu, which provides
> the format information. The pmu shall override this function
> and provide its own specific format information.
>
> If not overloaded the default format information is used:
>
> config config:0-63
> config1 config1:0-63
> config2 config2:0-63
Shouldn't config[012] be hard-coded like period? They are struct
perf_event_attr members after all and it doesn't really make sense to
have them dynamic if we're going to have to add them to all pmu/format
things.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists