[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F218D36.2060308@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:28:22 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Nebojsa Trpkovic <trx.lists@...il.com>, minchan@...nel.org,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
riel@...hat.com, Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: implement WasActive page flag (for improving cleancache)
On 01/25/2012 01:58 PM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> (Feedback welcome if there is a different/better way to do this
> without using a page flag!)
>
> Since about 2.6.27, the page replacement algorithm maintains
> an "active" bit to help decide which pages are most eligible
> to reclaim, see http://linux-mm.org/PageReplacementDesign
>
> This "active' information is also useful to cleancache but is lost
> by the time that cleancache has the opportunity to preserve the
> pageful of data. This patch adds a new page flag "WasActive" to
> retain the state. The flag may possibly be useful elsewhere.
I guess cleancache itself is clearing the bit, right? I didn't see any
clearing going on in the patch.
I do think it also needs to get cleared on the way in to the page
allocator. Otherwise:
PageSetWasActive(page);
free_page(page);
...
another_user_page = get_free_page()
// now cleancache sees the active bit for the prev user
Or am I missing somewhere it gets cleared non-explicitly somewhere?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists