[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120126173751.GA14400@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:37:51 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
virtualization@...ts.osdl.org, ohering@...e.com,
jbottomley@...allels.com, hch@...radead.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Staging: hv: Applied all the patches already in the
staging queue
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 09:38:34AM -0800, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> This patch gets the storage driver to the same level as in the staging tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/hv/storvsc_drv.c | 1301 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 files changed, 633 insertions(+), 668 deletions(-)
What? That changelog comment makes no sense at all, as you are patching
the staging version of the driver. This isn't an acceptable patch at
all.
Yes, I have pending patches for this driver in my "to-apply" queue, but
that is for 3.4, not now.
So, how about I just apply those patches, and then apply a patch that
moves it out of staging into drivers/scsi/, and queue all of those up
for 3.4.
James, any objection to that?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists