[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120126175122.GX22818@atomide.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:51:23 -0800
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
Dong Aisheng-B29396 <B29396@...escale.com>,
"Linus Walleij (linus.walleij@...aro.org)" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"Sascha Hauer (s.hauer@...gutronix.de)" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"cjb@...top.org" <cjb@...top.org>,
"Simon Glass (sjg@...omium.org)" <sjg@...omium.org>,
Dong Aisheng <dongas86@...il.com>,
Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@...aro.org>,
"Grant Likely (grant.likely@...retlab.ca)"
<grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Pinmux bindings proposal V2
Hi,
* Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org> [120126 00:53]:
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 01:00:52PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> ...
> > So to summarize: I suggest we'll just stick to basics to get the system
> > booting and devices working using device tree. In most cases the device
> > drivers should be able to configure the suspend and off states in a generic
> > way using pinctrl API. Everything else, like debugging, we can probably
> > do with userspace tools.
> >
> > This would mean just using a minimal subset of your binding, probably
> > very close to what you originally suggested.
> >
> IMHO, as a generic device tree binding, it should be able to cope with
> different use cases. It's really free for you to use the minimal
> subset of the binding as your need, but we should not make the binding
> design just be that minimal subset to force that everyone else can
> only use the minimal subset.
The main issue I have is that the example posted in this thread repeats
the same registers five times for one driver entry alone in the device
tree data. The repeated registers are TEGRA_PMX_PG_DTA and TEGRA_PMX_PG_DTD
in the example.
The alternative values are something that the pinmux/pinconf driver can
set based on state changes communicated from the driver using these pins.
That's why I think these alternative states should not be listed in the
device tree.
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists