[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120126180532.GA4077@dhcp-172-17-108-109.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:05:32 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@...e.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Dirk Gouders <gouders@...bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de>
Subject: Re: Slab corruption in floppy driver module
Hello,
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:04:20AM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> out_put_disk:
> while (dr--) {
> del_timer_sync(&motor_off_timer[dr]);
> - if (disks[dr]->queue)
> + if (disks[dr]->queue) {
> blk_cleanup_queue(disks[dr]->queue);
> + /*
> + * The request queue reference we took at device
> + * creation time has been put by above
> + * blk_cleanup_queue(). We have not called add_disk()
> + * yet and due to failure calling put_disk(). Put disk
> + * will try to put a reference to disk->queue which is
> + * taken in add_disk(). As we have not taken that
> + * extra reference, putting extra reference down
> + * will try to access already freed queue. Clear
> + * disk->queue before calling put_disk().
> + */
> + disks[dr]->queue = NULL;
Yeah, this looks correct to me. It might be better to tone down the
comment a bit tho. Wouldn't it be sufficient to say put_disk() isn't
paired with add_disk() and will put one extra time?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists