[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120125.213609.1699401522361877843.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:36:09 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: steweg@...t.sk
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v1, kernel 3.2.1] RTNETLINK adjusting values of
min_ifinfo_dump_size
From: Stefan Gula <steweg@...t.sk>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:43:15 +0100 (CET)
> From: Stefan Gula <steweg@...il.com>
>
> This patch extends the rtnetlink.c. The problem is that calcit, which
> returns the value min_ifinfo_dump_size, is called without ability to
> get device info as well (struct net_device *dev is not accessible from
> it). This create a problem if required size of struct sk_buff *skb is
> not enough big to comply with all data returned by fill_info function
> for the interface that required size can vary over time, e.g. some
> dynamic structures will be putted to skb like hlists or lists. To do
> this patch extends the do_setlink function with recalculating of
> min_ifinfo_dump_size accordingly to device type and get_size
> functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Gula <steweg@...il.com>
This commit message is terrible, and the reason I know it's terrible
is because even after reading it I still had to go read the code
in order to understand what your change even does or why it's even
necessary.
How about this:
Setting link parameters on a netdevice changes the value
of if_nlmsg_size(), therefore it is necessary to recalculate
min_ifinfo_dump_size.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists