| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20120126211450.GD700@fieldses.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:14:50 -0500
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
Cc: Trond.Myklebust@...app.com, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
xemul@...allels.com, neilb@...e.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jbottomley@...allels.com,
davem@...emloft.net, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] SUNRPC: service destruction in network namespace
context
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 05:47:26PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> This patch introduces network namespace filter for service destruction
> function.
> Nothing special here - just do exactly the same operations, but only for
> tranports in passed networks namespace context.
> BTW, BUG_ON() checks for empty service transports lists were returned into
> svc_destroy() function. This is because of swithing generic svc_close_all() to
> networks namespace dependable svc_close_net().
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
>
> ---
> include/linux/sunrpc/svcsock.h | 2 +-
> net/sunrpc/svc.c | 9 +++++++--
> net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++----------
> 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/svcsock.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/svcsock.h
> index c84e974..cb4ac69 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/svcsock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/svcsock.h
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ struct svc_sock {
> /*
> * Function prototypes.
> */
> -void svc_close_all(struct svc_serv *);
> +void svc_close_net(struct svc_serv *, struct net *);
> int svc_recv(struct svc_rqst *, long);
> int svc_send(struct svc_rqst *);
> void svc_drop(struct svc_rqst *);
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc.c b/net/sunrpc/svc.c
> index a8b49a0..279bbd8 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/svc.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/svc.c
> @@ -517,6 +517,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(svc_create_pooled);
> void
> svc_destroy(struct svc_serv *serv)
> {
> + struct net *net = current->nsproxy->net_ns;
> +
> dprintk("svc: svc_destroy(%s, %d)\n",
> serv->sv_program->pg_name,
> serv->sv_nrthreads);
> @@ -539,10 +541,13 @@ svc_destroy(struct svc_serv *serv)
> * caller is using--nfsd_mutex in the case of nfsd). So it's
> * safe to traverse those lists and shut everything down:
> */
> - svc_close_all(serv);
> + svc_close_net(serv, net);
> +
> + BUG_ON(!list_empty(&serv->sv_permsocks));
> + BUG_ON(!list_empty(&serv->sv_tempsocks));
I'm confused--what guarantees this is true, at this point?
There are two ways I could imagine containerizing svc_serv: either we
create a new one for each namespace, or we share a single global one
between them.
If the former, then something that takes a "serv" argument shouldn't
also need a "net" argument--the serv should already know which namespace
it belongs to.
If the latter, then these lists could have sockets from multiple
namespaces, and they aren't guaranteed to be empty here.
?
--b.
>
> if (serv->sv_shutdown)
> - serv->sv_shutdown(serv, current->nsproxy->net_ns);
> + serv->sv_shutdown(serv, net);
>
> cache_clean_deferred(serv);
>
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
> index 493e70b..4bda09d 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
> @@ -922,17 +922,19 @@ void svc_close_xprt(struct svc_xprt *xprt)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(svc_close_xprt);
>
> -static void svc_close_list(struct list_head *xprt_list)
> +static void svc_close_list(struct list_head *xprt_list, struct net *net)
> {
> struct svc_xprt *xprt;
>
> list_for_each_entry(xprt, xprt_list, xpt_list) {
> + if (xprt->xpt_net != net)
> + continue;
> set_bit(XPT_CLOSE, &xprt->xpt_flags);
> set_bit(XPT_BUSY, &xprt->xpt_flags);
> }
> }
>
> -static void svc_clear_pools(struct svc_serv *serv)
> +static void svc_clear_pools(struct svc_serv *serv, struct net *net)
> {
> struct svc_pool *pool;
> struct svc_xprt *xprt;
> @@ -944,36 +946,41 @@ static void svc_clear_pools(struct svc_serv *serv)
>
> spin_lock_bh(&pool->sp_lock);
> list_for_each_entry_safe(xprt, tmp, &pool->sp_sockets, xpt_ready) {
> + if (xprt->xpt_net != net)
> + continue;
> list_del_init(&xprt->xpt_ready);
> }
> spin_unlock_bh(&pool->sp_lock);
> }
> }
>
> -static void svc_clear_list(struct list_head *xprt_list)
> +static void svc_clear_list(struct list_head *xprt_list, struct net *net)
> {
> struct svc_xprt *xprt;
> struct svc_xprt *tmp;
>
> list_for_each_entry_safe(xprt, tmp, xprt_list, xpt_list) {
> + if (xprt->xpt_net != net)
> + continue;
> svc_delete_xprt(xprt);
> }
> - BUG_ON(!list_empty(xprt_list));
> + list_for_each_entry(xprt, xprt_list, xpt_list)
> + BUG_ON(xprt->xpt_net == net);
> }
>
> -void svc_close_all(struct svc_serv *serv)
> +void svc_close_net(struct svc_serv *serv, struct net *net)
> {
> - svc_close_list(&serv->sv_tempsocks);
> - svc_close_list(&serv->sv_permsocks);
> + svc_close_list(&serv->sv_tempsocks, net);
> + svc_close_list(&serv->sv_permsocks, net);
>
> - svc_clear_pools(serv);
> + svc_clear_pools(serv, net);
> /*
> * At this point the sp_sockets lists will stay empty, since
> * svc_enqueue will not add new entries without taking the
> * sp_lock and checking XPT_BUSY.
> */
> - svc_clear_list(&serv->sv_tempsocks);
> - svc_clear_list(&serv->sv_permsocks);
> + svc_clear_list(&serv->sv_tempsocks, net);
> + svc_clear_list(&serv->sv_permsocks, net);
> }
>
> /*
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists