[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120127084622.a16b0f43e6fcbd029cb1f923@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:46:22 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
<rdunlap@...otime.net>, <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <gleb@...hat.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (net/sock.h, jump_label, memcg)
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:31:13 +0400 Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com> wrote:
>
> On the specifics of this bug, I verified this config compiles okay in
> your tree + my patches at the day I last sent them. I also verified it
> breaks on the tree today.
>
> The reason seems to be that some other patch tweaked with the header
> files in an unrelated patch, and the static_branch definition that was
> getting to us in sock.h, is no longer getting there.
>
> Including it explicitly fixes it here. I will again pass through a
> battery of randconfigs on my own, and send you a fix.
Which is one of the reasons we have Rule 1 in Documentation/SubmitChecklist:
1: If you use a facility then #include the file that defines/declares
that facility. Don't depend on other header files pulling in ones
that you use.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists