linux-kernel - MCE: convert static array of pointers to per-cpu variables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120126234914.GA13031@suse.de>
Date:	Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:49:14 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
	Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>,
	Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...ndz.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>,
	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	gouders@...bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de,
	Marcos Souza <marcos.mage@...il.com>, justinmattock@...il.com,
	Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com>
Subject: MCE: convert static array of pointers to per-cpu variables

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

When I previously fixed up the mce_device code, I used a static array of
the pointers.  It was (rightfully) pointed out to me that I should be
using the per_cpu code instead.

This patch converts the code over to that structure, moving the variable
back into the per_cpu area, like it used to be for 3.2 and earlier.

Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h
index 6aefb14..441520e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static inline void enable_p5_mce(void) {}
 
 void mce_setup(struct mce *m);
 void mce_log(struct mce *m);
-extern struct device *mce_device[CONFIG_NR_CPUS];
+DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct device *, mce_device);
 
 /*
  * Maximum banks number.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
index 5a11ae2..4979a5d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
@@ -1859,7 +1859,7 @@ static struct bus_type mce_subsys = {
 	.dev_name	= "machinecheck",
 };
 
-struct device *mce_device[CONFIG_NR_CPUS];
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct device *, mce_device);
 
 __cpuinitdata
 void (*threshold_cpu_callback)(unsigned long action, unsigned int cpu);
@@ -2038,7 +2038,7 @@ static __cpuinit int mce_device_create(unsigned int cpu)
 			goto error2;
 	}
 	cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mce_device_initialized);
-	mce_device[cpu] = dev;
+	per_cpu(mce_device, cpu) = dev;
 
 	return 0;
 error2:
@@ -2055,7 +2055,7 @@ error:
 
 static __cpuinit void mce_device_remove(unsigned int cpu)
 {
-	struct device *dev = mce_device[cpu];
+	struct device *dev = per_cpu(mce_device, cpu);
 	int i;
 
 	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, mce_device_initialized))
@@ -2069,7 +2069,7 @@ static __cpuinit void mce_device_remove(unsigned int cpu)
 
 	device_unregister(dev);
 	cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mce_device_initialized);
-	mce_device[cpu] = NULL;
+	per_cpu(mce_device, cpu) = NULL;
 }
 
 /* Make sure there are no machine checks on offlined CPUs. */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c
index 786e76a..a4bf9d2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c
@@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ static __cpuinit int threshold_create_bank(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int bank)
 {
 	int i, err = 0;
 	struct threshold_bank *b = NULL;
-	struct device *dev = mce_device[cpu];
+	struct device *dev = per_cpu(mce_device, cpu);
 	char name[32];
 
 	sprintf(name, "threshold_bank%i", bank);
@@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ static __cpuinit int threshold_create_bank(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int bank)
 		if (i == cpu)
 			continue;
 
-		dev = mce_device[i];
+		dev = per_cpu(mce_device, i);
 		if (dev)
 			err = sysfs_create_link(&dev->kobj,b->kobj, name);
 		if (err)
@@ -665,7 +665,8 @@ static void threshold_remove_bank(unsigned int cpu, int bank)
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 	/* sibling symlink */
 	if (shared_bank[bank] && b->blocks->cpu != cpu) {
-		sysfs_remove_link(&mce_device[cpu]->kobj, name);
+		dev = per_cpu(mce_device, cpu);
+		sysfs_remove_link(&dev->kobj, name);
 		per_cpu(threshold_banks, cpu)[bank] = NULL;
 
 		return;
@@ -677,7 +678,7 @@ static void threshold_remove_bank(unsigned int cpu, int bank)
 		if (i == cpu)
 			continue;
 
-		dev = mce_device[i];
+		dev = per_cpu(mce_device, i);
 		if (dev)
 			sysfs_remove_link(&dev->kobj, name);
 		per_cpu(threshold_banks, i)[bank] = NULL;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/