lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1327639810-12760-1-git-send-email-ebiederm@xmission.com>
Date:	Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:49:42 -0800
From:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
To:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Damien Millescamps <damien.millescamps@...nd.com>,
	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: [PATCH 01/29] sysctl: remove impossible condition check

From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi>

Remove checks for conditions that will never happen. If procname is NULL
the loop would already had bailed out, so there's no need to check it
again.

At the same time this also compacts the function find_in_table() by
refactoring it to be easier to read.

Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi>
Reviewed-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
---
 fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c |   14 ++------------
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
index a6b6217..d82f4a8 100644
--- a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
@@ -59,17 +59,11 @@ out:
 
 static struct ctl_table *find_in_table(struct ctl_table *p, struct qstr *name)
 {
-	int len;
 	for ( ; p->procname; p++) {
-
-		if (!p->procname)
-			continue;
-
-		len = strlen(p->procname);
-		if (len != name->len)
+		if (strlen(p->procname) != name->len)
 			continue;
 
-		if (memcmp(p->procname, name->name, len) != 0)
+		if (memcmp(p->procname, name->name, name->len) != 0)
 			continue;
 
 		/* I have a match */
@@ -266,10 +260,6 @@ static int scan(struct ctl_table_header *head, ctl_table *table,
 	for (; table->procname; table++, (*pos)++) {
 		int res;
 
-		/* Can't do anything without a proc name */
-		if (!table->procname)
-			continue;
-
 		if (*pos < file->f_pos)
 			continue;
 
-- 
1.7.2.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ