[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <B5906170F1614E41A8A28DE3B8D1214331791FA2@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:39:28 +0000
From: "Bedia, Vaibhav" <vaibhav.bedia@...com>
To: Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>
CC: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 3/3] ARM: tegra: cpuidle driver for tegra
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 12:40:58, Colin Cross wrote:
> local_irq_enable() is required by the cpuidle call semantics. See
> arch/arm/process.c, it has a WARN_ON(irqs_disabled()) after the
> idle function call. The local_irq_disable() can and probably should
> be dropped, although a comment that the function is called with
> interrupts off and is expected to return with interrupts on would be
> helpful.
>
Ah... I was too fixated on local_irq_disable() and local_irq_enable() in cpu_idle().
Thanks for clarifying.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists