[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F21F638.2080306@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:56:24 +0800
From: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC: Xiaotian Feng <xtfeng@...il.com>, ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched: Accelerate "pick_next_entity" under special
condition
On 01/25/2012 11:55 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 11:04 +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
>>
>>> Then what if condition 1 is true now?
>>
>> We can see in original code, even condition 1 is true, we
>> still will use value3 if condition3 is true, like this:
>>
>> original:
>>
>> condition1 condition3 result
>> true true value3
>> true false value1
>>
>> That means if condition3 is true, we don't care whether
>> condition1 is true or not because we will finally use value3.
>
> Right, so from the original 8 possible states we used to evaluate 3*8 =
> 24 conditionals. The new code will reduce this to 1*4 + 2*2 + 2*3 = 14.
>
> Now I guess the question is if it matters for the modal or average
> state.
>
Hi, Peter
I think how much help this patch can do on the performance depends on
how often the condition2 and 3 occur.
> I've applied the patch since it can't be worse, but I've no idea if it
> matters or not in practice.
It's hardly to say how useful this patch is, but it will do some help
under special condition.
Thanks for your review.
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists