[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <00de01ccdce1$e7c8a360$b759ea20$%szyprowski@samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:53:29 +0100
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
To: 'Ohad Ben-Cohen' <ohad@...ery.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
'Daniel Walker' <dwalker@...eaurora.org>,
'Russell King' <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
'Arnd Bergmann' <arnd@...db.de>,
'Jonathan Corbet' <corbet@....net>,
'Mel Gorman' <mel@....ul.ie>,
'Michal Nazarewicz' <mina86@...a86.com>,
'Dave Hansen' <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
'Jesse Barker' <jesse.barker@...aro.org>,
'Kyungmin Park' <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
'Andrew Morton' <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
'KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki' <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: RE: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 12/15] drivers: add Contiguous Memory
Allocator
Hi Ohad,
On Friday, January 27, 2012 10:44 AM Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> With v19, I can't seem to allocate big regions anymore (e.g. 101MiB).
> In particular, this seems to fail:
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Marek Szyprowski
> <m.szyprowski@...sung.com> wrote:
> > +static int cma_activate_area(unsigned long base_pfn, unsigned long count)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long pfn = base_pfn;
> > + unsigned i = count >> pageblock_order;
> > + struct zone *zone;
> > +
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(!pfn_valid(pfn));
> > + zone = page_zone(pfn_to_page(pfn));
> > +
> > + do {
> > + unsigned j;
> > + base_pfn = pfn;
> > + for (j = pageblock_nr_pages; j; --j, pfn++) {
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(!pfn_valid(pfn));
> > + if (page_zone(pfn_to_page(pfn)) != zone)
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> The above WARN_ON_ONCE is triggered, and then the conditional is
> asserted (page_zone() retuns a "Movable" zone, whereas zone is
> "Normal") and the function fails.
>
> This happens to me on OMAP4 with your 3.3-rc1-cma-v19 branch (and a
> bunch of remoteproc/rpmsg patches).
>
> Do big allocations work for you ?
I've tested it with 256MiB on Exynos4 platform. Could you check if the
problem also appears on 3.2-cma-v19 branch (I've uploaded it a few hours
ago) and 3.2-cma-v18? Both are available on our public repo:
git://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-samsung/
The above code has not been changed since v16, so I'm really surprised
that it causes problems. Maybe the memory configuration or layout has
been changed in 3.3-rc1 for OMAP4?
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski
Samsung Poland R&D Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists