[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F22C0EE.4090701@parallels.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:21:18 +0400
From: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
CC: "Trond.Myklebust@...app.com" <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
"linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...allels.com>,
"neilb@...e.de" <neilb@...e.de>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <jbottomley@...allels.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"devel@...nvz.org" <devel@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] SUNRPC: service destruction in network namespace
context
27.01.2012 18:33, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
> OK, so at this point svc_close_net(serv, current->nsproxy->net_ns) is
> enough to clear out sv_permsocks and sv_temp_socks because we know that
> the only sockets left are in that namespace. Got it.
>
BTW, is this approach looks suitable for NFSd service?
> I'm not sure. The one thing that might have helped mere here would be
> a comment to explain what's going on, maybe something like:
>
> svc_close_net(serv, net);
> + /*
> + * The last user is gone, so the only sockets left belonged its
> + * network namespace:
> + */
> BUG_ON(!list_empty(&serv->sv_permsocks));
> BUG_ON(!list_empty(&serv->sv_tempsocks));
Ok, can do so.
--
Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists