[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F22F2D4.4080605@schaufler-ca.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:54:12 -0800
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
To: Kees Cook <kees@...ntu.com>
CC: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] AppArmor: refactor securityfs to use structures
On 1/26/2012 4:29 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> This is the ground-work for expanding the AppArmor securityfs to include
> useful information that the userspace tools can more easily interact with.
> Presently, this is only static information about the state of AppArmor.
If you're making changes for securityfs do you suppose that
you might do all of us LSM developers a huge favor and add an
entry that reports the active LSM? It's something that has been
on my todo list for ages and would make everyone's life so much
easier. /sys/kernel/security/LSM which contains the name of the
active LSM would be very handy.
>
> -Kees
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists