[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120127114416.2621963a@jbarnes-desktop>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:44:16 -0800
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
To: "Kay, Allen M" <allen.m.kay@...el.com>
Cc: "linux-pci-owner@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci-owner@...r.kernel.org>,
"Barnes, Jesse" <jesse.barnes@...el.com>,
"Wilcox, Matthew R" <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"jean.guyader@...citrix.com" <jean.guyader@...citrix.com>,
"eric.chanudet@...rix.com" <eric.chanudet@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1][resend] check for pci bar restore completion and
retry
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:25:53 -0800
"Kay, Allen M" <allen.m.kay@...el.com> wrote:
> On some OEM systems, pci_restore_state() is called while FLR has not yet
> completed. As a result, PCI BAR register restore is not successful. This fix
> reads back the restored value and compares it with saved value and re-tries 10
> times before giving up.
Applied, but I don't think I got an answer as to why we don't do this
delay/check when we perform the FLR in the first place?
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists