[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1327700063.2446.178.camel@twins>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:34:23 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Andrew Steets <asteets@...advisors.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: perf: prctl(PR_TASK_PERF_EVENTS_DISABLE) has no effect
On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 14:06 -0600, Andrew Steets wrote:
> On 1/27/12 11:12 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 11:03 -0600, Andrew Steets wrote:
> >> Can anyone tell
> >> me if I'm using this wrong or if this is a bug?
> >
> > You're using it wrong, it will disable events you own (created) not
> > events that monitor you.
>
> Is there an alternate way of disabling events that monitor the current
> process?
Nope, nor will there ever be.
> I ask because I came across the following description in
> tools/perf/design.txt:
>
> A process can enable or disable all the counter groups that are
> attached to it, using prctl:
>
> prctl(PR_TASK_PERF_EVENTS_ENABLE);
>
> prctl(PR_TASK_PERF_EVENTS_DISABLE);
>
> This applies to all counters on the current process, whether created
> by this process or by another, and doesn't affect any counters that
> this process has created on other processes. It only enables or
> disables the group leaders, not any other members in the groups.
That's wrong.. also I wouldn't ever allow such a 'feature', that's just
asking for trouble.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists