[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F221AFE.6070108@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:33:18 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Nebojsa Trpkovic <trx.lists@...il.com>, minchan@...nel.org,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: implement WasActive page flag (for improving cleancache)
On 01/26/2012 09:43 PM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> Maybe the Active page bit could be overloaded with some minor
> rewriting? IOW, perhaps the Active bit could be ignored when
> the page is moved to the inactive LRU? (Confusing I know, but I am
> just brainstorming...)
The PG_referenced bit is already overloaded. We keep
the bit set when we move a page from the active to the
inactive list, so a page that was previously active
only needs to be referenced once to become active again.
The LRU bits (PG_lru, PG_active, etc) are needed to
figure out which LRU list the page is on. I don't
think we can overload those...
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists