linux-kernel - Re: [linux-pm] PM: cannot hibernate -- BUG at kernel/workqueue.c:3659

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:11:04 +0530
From:	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC:	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Baohua.Song@....com,
	"pavel@....cz" <pavel@....cz>,
	Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] PM: cannot hibernate -- BUG at kernel/workqueue.c:3659

On 01/28/2012 04:14 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

>> Rafael, thanks for the clarification in the other mail.
>>
>> Acked-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>> I think we need to get this into 3.2-stable as well, as Jiri mentioned.
> 
> Yes, we do.
> 
> Below it goes again with the missing comment in user.c and a changelog.
> 
> Please let me know if there's anything wrong with it, otherwise I'm going
> to push it to Linus in a couple of days.
> 
> Thanks,
> Rafael
> 
> ---
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> Subject: PM / Hibernate: Fix s2disk regression related to freezing workqueues
> 
> Commit 2aede851ddf08666f68ffc17be446420e9d2a056
> 
>   PM / Hibernate: Freeze kernel threads after preallocating memory
> 
> introduced a mechanism by which kernel threads were frozen after
> the preallocation of hibernate image memory to avoid problems with
> frozen kernel threads not responding to memory freeing requests.
> However, it overlooked the s2disk code path in which the
> SNAPSHOT_CREATE_IMAGE ioctl was run directly after SNAPSHOT_FREE,
> which caused freeze_workqueues_begin() to BUG(), because it saw
> that worqueues had been already frozen.
> 
> Although in principle this issue might be addressed by removing
> the relevant BUG_ON() from freeze_workqueues_begin(), that would
> reintroduce the very problem that commit 2aede851ddf08666f68ffc17be4
> attempted to avoid into that particular code path.  For this reason,
> to fix the issue at hand, introduce thaw_kernel_threads() and make
> the SNAPSHOT_FREE ioctl execute it.
> 
> Special thanks to Srivatsa S. Bhat for detailed analysis of the
> problem.
> 
> Reported-and-tested-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> Acked-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>


Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org ?

Other than that, the patch is perfect!

Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat

> ---
>  include/linux/freezer.h |    2 ++
>  kernel/power/process.c  |   19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/power/user.c     |    9 +++++++++
>  3 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
> 
> Index: linux/include/linux/freezer.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/include/linux/freezer.h
> +++ linux/include/linux/freezer.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ extern bool __refrigerator(bool check_kt
>  extern int freeze_processes(void);
>  extern int freeze_kernel_threads(void);
>  extern void thaw_processes(void);
> +extern void thaw_kernel_threads(void);
> 
>  static inline bool try_to_freeze(void)
>  {
> @@ -174,6 +175,7 @@ static inline bool __refrigerator(bool c
>  static inline int freeze_processes(void) { return -ENOSYS; }
>  static inline int freeze_kernel_threads(void) { return -ENOSYS; }
>  static inline void thaw_processes(void) {}
> +static inline void thaw_kernel_threads(void) {}
> 
>  static inline bool try_to_freeze(void) { return false; }
> 
> Index: linux/kernel/power/process.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/kernel/power/process.c
> +++ linux/kernel/power/process.c
> @@ -188,3 +188,22 @@ void thaw_processes(void)
>  	printk("done.\n");
>  }
> 
> +void thaw_kernel_threads(void)
> +{
> +	struct task_struct *g, *p;
> +
> +	pm_nosig_freezing = false;
> +	printk("Restarting kernel threads ... ");
> +
> +	thaw_workqueues();
> +
> +	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> +	do_each_thread(g, p) {
> +		if (p->flags & (PF_KTHREAD | PF_WQ_WORKER))
> +			__thaw_task(p);
> +	} while_each_thread(g, p);
> +	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> +
> +	schedule();
> +	printk("done.\n");
> +}
> Index: linux/kernel/power/user.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/kernel/power/user.c
> +++ linux/kernel/power/user.c
> @@ -274,6 +274,15 @@ static long snapshot_ioctl(struct file *
>  		swsusp_free();
>  		memset(&data->handle, 0, sizeof(struct snapshot_handle));
>  		data->ready = 0;
> +		/*
> +		 * It is necessary to thaw kernel threads here, because
> +		 * SNAPSHOT_CREATE_IMAGE may be invoked directly after
> +		 * SNAPSHOT_FREE.  In that case, if kernel threads were not
> +		 * thawed, the preallocation of memory carried out by
> +		 * hibernation_snapshot() might run into problems (i.e. it
> +		 * might fail or even deadlock).
> +		 */
> +		thaw_kernel_threads();
>  		break;
> 
>  	case SNAPSHOT_PREF_IMAGE_SIZE:


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/