[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJd=RBC+yfoFhNrsu7XCS1_84_HVKb4R_JavHh3Fb-_47_nWQA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 21:25:37 +0800
From: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 -mm 1/3] mm: reclaim at order 0 when compaction is enabled
Hi Rik
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> wrote:
[...]
> @@ -2754,7 +2754,7 @@ loop_again:
> */
> for (i = 0; i <= end_zone; i++) {
> struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
> - int nr_slab;
> + int nr_slab, testorder;
> unsigned long balance_gap;
>
> if (!populated_zone(zone))
> @@ -2787,7 +2787,20 @@ loop_again:
> (zone->present_pages +
> KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO-1) /
> KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO);
> - if (!zone_watermark_ok_safe(zone, order,
> + /*
> + * Kswapd reclaims only single pages with compaction
> + * enabled. Trying too hard to reclaim until contiguous
> + * free pages have become available can hurt performance
> + * by evicting too much useful data from memory.
> + * Do not reclaim more than needed for compaction.
> + */
> + testorder = order;
> + if (COMPACTION_BUILD && order &&
> + compaction_suitable(zone, order) !=
> + COMPACT_SKIPPED)
> + testorder = 0;
> +
> + if (!zone_watermark_ok_safe(zone, testorder,
> high_wmark_pages(zone) + balance_gap,
> end_zone, 0)) {
> shrink_zone(priority, zone, &sc);
Hard to understand that zone is shrunk as hard as it was,
with water mark checked with new order, tippoint please.
Hillf
Powered by blists - more mailing lists